Skip to content
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
National Association of Attorneys General
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
Log In
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us

Rosenblum v. Living Essentials: A Victory for Oregon Consumers

Home / Consumer Protection / Rosenblum v. Living Essentials: A Victory for Oregon Consumers
May 22, 2023 Consumer Protection
Share this

  • Carson L. Whitehead
    Senior Assistant Attorney General, Appellate Division
    Oregon Department of Justice

On May 5, 2023, the Oregon Supreme Court issued a significant opinion affirming the Attorney General’s authority under Oregon’s Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA) to take enforcement action against false and misleading marketing. State ex rel. Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC, 371 Or. 23 (2023). The case is a long-running action against Living Essentials, makers of 5-hour ENERGY, the 2-ounce energy drink sold at gas stations and convenience stores nationwide. Oregon alleged that Living Essentials violated the UTPA by making false and misleading claims about the effects of the non-caffeine ingredients in 5-hour ENERGY.

Following a lengthy bench trial, the trial court entered a verdict for Living Essentials, but in doing so, the court added an element to the UTPA that required the state to prove that any false or misleading claims were material to consumer purchasing decisions. The state appealed, and the Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision to include a materiality requirement because, without that element, the court believed the UTPA would violate the free speech clause of the Oregon Constitution. The state petitioned for review, asking the Oregon Supreme Court to properly construe the UTPA and arguing that the state may prohibit false and misleading marketing without running afoul of the Oregon’s free speech protections.

Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution is perhaps the most protective free speech clause in the country. Since the early 1980s, the Oregon courts have applied an absolutist methodology in considering whether a law violates Article I, section 8. If a law targets speech directly, the law is invalid unless it fits within a well-established exception to free speech protections that existed at the time the Oregon Constitution was adopted in 1859. There is no means-end balancing, no levels of scrutiny, and no commercial speech doctrine that permits greater government regulation. The recognized historical exceptions are common-law crimes or causes of action, including perjury, solicitation, defamation, and fraud. To fit within one of those historical exceptions, the contemporary law must be analogous to the common-law crime or cause of action. The difficult question is how analogous is the UTPA to common-law fraud.

In Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, the court held that the historical exception for fraud is very broad and allows the UTPA’s prohibition on false and misleading marketing. To reach that decision, the court first concluded that the relevant provisions of the UTPA mean what they say. They do not contain a requirement that the state prove at trial that a misrepresentation is material to consumer purchasing decisions. Instead, the state simply needs to prove that a business made false or misleading representations about its products or services.

The court then addressed the scope of the historical exception from free speech protections that applies to fraud. A claim for common-law fraud requires a plaintiff to prove falsity, materiality, knowledge of falsity, intent to deceive, reliance, injury, and causation. But under the UTPA, the state merely needs to prove that the business made a false representation about its products or services for the Attorney General to bring an action. The supreme court determined that there need not be a one-to-one correspondence with the historical cause of action for the UTPA to fall within the exception for fraud. Rather, the court concluded that the UTPA serves the same core purpose as common-law fraud and similar prohibitions on false commercial speech that existed in 1859: protecting people from the economic harm that arises from deceptive conduct in the market for goods and services. Based on that purpose—which is unrelated to suppression of detrimental ideas or messages themselves—the UTPA does not conflict with Article I, section 8.

The court’s opinion is an important one for Oregon consumers. It confirms that the Attorney General has authority to protect Oregonians from false and misleading marketing and that businesses cannot use the constitution as a shield for their unlawful conduct. Free speech is a cherished right in Oregon, and our courts properly take a hard look at laws that implicate free speech. However, nothing in the Oregon or United States Constitutions gives business the right to lie to consumers.

Following the court’s decision, this case goes back to the Oregon Court of Appeals to reach the other legal issues that the appellate court did not reach in its first opinion, including the correct standards for whether a claim is false and whether a claim is likely to confuse consumers. The Attorney General looks forward to resolving those important questions.

 

Other articles in this edition include:

  • Attorney General Consumer Protection News: June 2022
  • Federal Consumer Protection News: June 2022

NAAG-NAGTRI Center for Consumer Protection logo

Related Posts

Related Posts

Center for Consumer Protection Monthly - November 2024

Center for Consumer Protection Monthly - December 2024

Shows no photo available image placeholder

Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday Appointed Co-Chair of the Association’s Consumer Protection Committee

Connect with NAAG and the Attorney General Community

Create a NAAG account to subscribe to our newsletters or mailing lists.

Create Account
Subscribe
Marble columns and the top of a federal building

scroll to filters

White Logo for the National Association of Attorneys General

1850 M Street NW
12th floor
Washington, DC 20036

TEL 202-326-6000
EMAIL 

Youtube
  • Issues
    • Issues
      • Anticorruption
      • Antitrust
      • Bankruptcy
      • Charities
      • Civil Law
    • Issues
      • Consumer Protection
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber and Technology
      • Disaster Preparedness & Response
      • Elder Justice
    • Issues
      • Ethics
      • Human Trafficking
      • Medicaid Fraud
      • Opioids
      • Powers & Duties
    • Issues
      • Public Health
      • The U.S. Supreme Court
      • Tobacco
      • Veterans & Military
  • Our Work
    • Training & Research
    • Centers
      • Center for Consumer Protection
      • Center for Supreme Court Advocacy
      • Center for Tobacco & Public Health
    • Committees
    • Initiatives
      • Presidential Initiative
      • Strategic Partnerships
      • International Fellows
      • COVID-19
    • Bankruptcy
    • Policy & Advocacy
  • Events & Training
    • Event Calendar
    • Attorney General Symposium
    • Presidential Summit
    • Capital Forum
    • Region Meetings
    • CLE Credit
    • NAAG Trainings
    • Online Learning
    • NAMFCU Trainings
    • NAAG Faculty
  • News & Resources
    • Attorney General Journal
    • Reports & Publications
    • Newsroom
    • NAAG Policy Letters
    • Podcasts
    • Online Learning
    • Research & Data
    • Member Directory
  • Attorneys General
    • What Attorneys General Do
    • Who is my Attorney General?
    • Attorneys General Office 101
    • Research & Data
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Careers in Attorney General Offices
    • Careers in Medicaid Fraud Control Units
  • About NAAG
    • NAAG Staff
    • NAAG Leadership
    • NAAG Member Services
    • NAAG Regions
    • NAAG FAQs
    • SAGE
    • NAMFCU
    • Newsroom
    • Careers at NAAG
  • Find my AG
  • About NAMFCU
    • About the Medicaid Fraud Control Units
    • Reporting Fraud and Abuse
    • MFCU Member Hub
    • Careers with a MFCU
  • Contact Us
  • Find My AG
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Member Benefits
  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy & Cookies Notice
  • Sitemap
  • Member Login

About the National Association of Attorneys General

As the nonpartisan national forum for America's state and territory attorneys general and their staff, NAAG provides collaboration, insight, and expertise to empower and champion America's attorneys general.
Learn More

© 2025 Copyright National Association of Attorneys General

Website by Yoko Co

Internal Feedback / Report an Error

Request an Update / Report an Error

The change you are requesting will be linked to this page. The URL for the page will be included in a hidden field when the form is submitted.
Please enter your change or describe your request. Be sure to reference where the error appears on the page and what needs to be done specifically.
Upload any files that need to be linked to this page. PDF only. Submit another request if you have more than five files to upload.
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: pdf, docx, xls, Max. file size: 128 MB, Max. files: 5.

    Who is requesting this change?(Required)

    Scroll To Top

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
        To provide you more clarity about how we collect, store and use personal information, and your rights to control that information, we have updated our privacy policy, which also explains how we use cookies. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.I Agree